Sorry for being MIA (more about that in a later post), but here is another monday, and another pattern-suggestion.
This Monday I am bringing you the Finch blouse from Charlie Darwin Textiles.
Sorry for being MIA (more about that in a later post), but here is another monday, and another pattern-suggestion.
This Monday I am bringing you the Finch blouse from Charlie Darwin Textiles.
You might have notice, that I am trying to bring patterns, that are different than the boring, bland, somewhat loose fitting... meh.
So here is something that has everything.
Zinaida from Berocco /Alison Green
It has cables, it has lace, it has somewhat different shaping... shall I say more?Oh well... once again, one that will not be popular...
Timothee Chalamet and his opera/ballet comment.
Once again the world is down, like vultures on a dead animal, on him, because he dared to say out loud what he thinks. (What actually so many things though they would not dare to say it out loud, especially not publicly). That he does not care about opera and ballet, and thinks that most of the people do not care either. And everybody and their mother posting how much they DO LOVE them (opera and ballet).
Of course, I am a philologist, and kind of an "artist" (okay, a craftsman), and these opinions fill my social media, however Norbert, who is a male, an IT guy, his family is coming from a small village, and he sees totally different things on his FB.
On the other hand, I am seeing newsflashes like "T.CH.'s chances to win the Oscar just dropped".
So, what is my opinion? I know it might be not elegant to admit, but I am NOT an opera fan, nor a ballet fan. I see and value the effort, the performance, but I did not grow up with either of them, and I would probably choose some other form of theatre, if I could. I also think there are a lot more people who do not care for those (opera and ballet) than who love them, and I think neither type is better or worst.
Does Timothee Chalamet has the right to his opinion? Yes.
Was Timothee right? Yes. Okay, maybe not about "nobody" cares, because appareantly, seeing the internet reactions there are still people out there, but let's admit it: opera and ballet are not the part of the mainstream culture anymore. With all do respect to the singers, musicians, dancers, tickets to their performance is less and less affordable to the average people and there are increasingly more and more alternatives for entertaiment.
Was it a smart way to voice/phrase it? No. Of course, there would be a ton of ways to phrase it differently, better, less rude, less dissmissive way.
Should he loose "his chances" for the Oscar because of it? NO. Oscar should be given because his acting, and not because he likes opera and ballet or not.
I understand that opera and ballet loosing its popularity is a bitter pill to swallow for its artists and fans, but its not Timothee Chalamet sho should be punished for that.
Oh, BTW, I am not alone with my opinion: there is the Vanity Fair article, The Week article, and the msnow article, and these are just the first three find when doing a google search with "was Timothee Chalamet right about opera", while there is a lot more.
P.S.: Who knows.... maybe he did it on purpouse, to draw attention to these arts?
Since some of you did say, it is not such a bad idea... This column might not come at every week, but I will do my best to bring you pictures of travels... And since we just came back from London a week ago, I will start with that trip.
When we arrived, we dashed to the Victoria and Albert Museum to pick up my membershi card, because I could not breath easy until I checked that I CAN get in the Marie Antoinette exhibition (more on that next tuesday). But then I did not wanted to go into that exhibition just yet. We started at very early morning, with very little sleep, I was sleepy, I was tired, I wanted to go there fully alert, so I can soak up everything.
Also, I wanted to let Norbert to have fun and see museums that interest HIM (yes, he would look at me at all the clothes I want, but he is a man). I suggested the two museums that are literally "just across the street" (the Science Museum and the Natural History Museum is there), and he choose the closer one :-) So we went into the Natural History Museum.
Well, I admit, I have been into the Science Museum and the British Museum before, and was less enthusiastic, but boy, was I pleasantly surpised.
First of all, the museum is free to visit. Yes, they accept donations, but they do not big you to give them money (unlike the Science Museum did, but then, that is yet another story).
There is an Earthquakes and Volcanos echibition going on, into wich you go into through this elevator:
Take a look from closer:
Then, you can try a lot of things, like just how does a seizmograph work, how the elements move, how sands and stones mix, how water flows, and most of those things are really interestingly interactive.
Long gone the museums, where one just looks.
There is even a room, set up like a japanese store, and when you are in it, it stimulates, how things move around, when an earthquake hits.Aside from the Volcanos and eathquakes exhibitions, there are a ton of interesting things around the museum, which is huge. I mean HUGE. We walked almost 20 thousand steps in there.There is of course how humans developed.
Lately I have a hankering for a red leather biker jacket... Yes, I know. I do not have the space or the money for it, nor would I be able to use it enough to justify the cost. But I was thinking, what if I sew myself a red jacket, maybe from velvet or courdory, whould that staisfy the hankering?
For the moment I am working hard to resist the urge to 1) buy the red leather jacket, 2) order all the red velvet online, but admittedly, I was searching for and looking for the best sewing pattern for a biker jacket.
And while I was doing that, I came across this jacket, that I thought, would be a good candidate for this monday's pattern-column.
It is the Shimla jacket.
I absolutely love the standing collar and all the small ruffles.
Even if it is ever so small.
Not that I have not knitted, since last spring, when I last posted actual knitting here, because I did, but most of that knitting was done in the car, and most of it was utterly boring, around and around stocking knitting, as in the fall of 2024 I sold all but one pair of my historical stockings and I wanted to replenish the stocking stocks (pun intented).
This year I wholeheartedly wanted to do my New Year's sweater, but I spectacularly failed that one, I did not like it and I frogged it, so to get back my mojo, I wanted someting small and colorful... and it was... yes a pair of socks, but unlike the historical knee high ones, these were short, colorful, and would have been quick, if I wouldn't kept putting them off for other, more urgent stuff.
When we left for London, it only needed a few rows from its ribbing, and a couple of nights ago, when we were watching TV and I was between bigger projects, I finished them.
Simple, toe up, short row toes and heels, stockinett socks, with "contrasting" toes, heels and cuffs, which I knit wider, because I often turn them down.