Because that is what I've sewn in the last couple of weeks... and not even for myself.
Since they were made more like work, I was trying to keep track of time, thus didn't really made photoes while making them (except for one short video-clip, but you will see that, somewhere below.
If you ever talked to me about historical clothes, you already know that I am a firm believer of the underwear matters principle. And while I do make concessions sometimes. Even though I have knitted quite a number of historical stockings, I do wear modern cotton knee high sockings for most events, sometimes I wear a modern tank top under my corsets, but from the very first time I paid attention to underwear (too).
This time I was asked to make a set to wear under an 1870-ies dress, so...
A chemise was made, from the combination of a plain cotton, and embroidered batist.
Decorated with a bit of lace, a blue ribbon, and pintucks. (I absolutely adore pintucks, and totally do not mind doing them).Then the bustle, a grand bustle very similar to mine:This is the same fabric-combo, plain cotton, somewhat stonger and thicker than the one I used for the chemise and the drawers, but the same embroidered batist for the ruffles.
Pintucks galore:
And on its new owner.
No comments:
Post a Comment